Which published cohorts overlap my inputs?
This retrieves evidence from populations with overlapping reported ranges. It does not predict an individual outcome or assess candidacy.
Follow-upAll reported follow-upsProceduresICL
10 relevant study cohorts
1,278 observed eyes across matching follow-ups
Percentages are results a study reported for its own patients, not a prediction for you. Where a study measured an outcome more than once, the latest matching follow-up is shown. “Not reported” means the study did not publish that number; it does not mean zero.
What do these outcomes mean?Hide what these outcomes mean
Share of checked eyes that could see 20/20 or better without glasses or contact lenses after treatment.
Share of checked eyes that landed within half a diopter of the correction the study aimed for.
Share of checked eyes that landed within one diopter of the correction the study aimed for.
Share meeting that study’s definition of dry eye; questionnaires, tests and thresholds can differ.
Share reporting rings around lights under the questions and symptom threshold used by that study.
Share reporting uncomfortable or scattered brightness under the questions and threshold used by that study.
Share reporting rays or streaks around lights under the questions and threshold used by that study.
Share of checked eyes with postoperative corneal haze under the grading threshold and observation window used by that study. Transient and persistent haze are not interchangeable.
Share of treated eyes diagnosed with infectious keratitis during the study’s observation window. Case definitions and follow-up duration may differ.
Share of treated eyes diagnosed with postoperative endophthalmitis during the study’s observation window. Exact event counts and follow-up are essential for this rare serious event.
Share diagnosed with post-surgery corneal weakening during the period that study observed its patients.
Share whose dry-eye questionnaire score fell within the range that study defined as normal; this is not automatically the inverse of a dry-eye diagnosis rate.
A questionnaire score about dry-eye symptoms and their effect on daily life; lower scores generally mean fewer symptoms.
Seconds before the tear film starts to break apart after a blink; longer times generally indicate a more stable tear film.
Millimetres of wetting on a paper strip used to assess tear production; testing protocols can differ between studies.
A patient-reported dry-eye symptom score using the questionnaire selected by that study; scales are not interchangeable.
| Cohort | 20/20+ | ±0.50 D | ±1.00 D | Dry eye | Halos | Glare | Starbursts | Haze | Keratitis | Endophthalmitis | Ectasia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICL · EVO Implantable Collamer LensThree Year Results from the United States FDA Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study of the EVO/EVO+ Implantable Collamer Lens (2025)629 eyes · 3 years · filter match | not reported | 90.7%629 eyes assessed · reported at/by 3 years | 99.0%629 eyes assessed · reported at/by 3 years | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not applicable | not applicable | not reported | not applicable |
| ICL · EVO Implantable Collamer LensEight-Year Outcomes of Implantation of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens With a Central Port for Moderate to High Ametropia (2021)177 eyes · 8 years · filter match | not reported | 83.0%177 eyes assessed · reported at/by 8 years | 93.0%177 eyes assessed · reported at/by 8 years | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not applicable | not applicable | not reported | not applicable |
| ICL · EVO Implantable Collamer LensA Nationwide Multicenter Study on 1-Year Outcomes of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation for Low Myopia (2022)172 eyes · 1 year · filter match | not reported | 91.0%172 eyes assessed · reported at/by 1 year | 100.0%172 eyes assessed · reported at/by 1 year | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not applicable | not applicable | not reported | not applicable |
| ICLOne-Stage Versus Two-Stage Bilateral Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation: A Comparison of Efficacy and Safety (2024)100 eyes · Mean 1.1 years · filter match | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not applicable | not applicable | 0%0 of 100 eyes · reported at/by Mean 1.1 years | not applicable |
| ICL · EVO Implantable Collamer LensComparison of Persistent Postoperative Discomfort 1 Year after Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction and Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation (2025)97 eyes · 1 year · filter match | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | 63.9%97 patients assessed · reported at/by 1 year | 64.9%97 patients assessed · reported at/by 1 year | not reported | not applicable | not applicable | not reported | not applicable |
| ICLOne-Stage Versus Two-Stage Bilateral Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation: A Comparison of Efficacy and Safety (2024)78 eyes · Mean 1.3 years · filter match | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not applicable | not applicable | 0%0 of 78 eyes · reported at/by Mean 1.3 years | not applicable |
| ICL · EVO Implantable Collamer LensVisual Outcomes, Footplate Position and Vault Achieved with the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens for Myopic Astigmatism (2021)42 eyes · 3 months · filter match | 89.0%Denominator not reported · reported at/by 3 months | 74.0%Denominator not reported · reported at/by 3 months | 98.0%Denominator not reported · reported at/by 3 months | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not applicable | not applicable | not reported | not applicable |
| ICL · EVO Implantable Collamer LensTwo-Year Visual Outcomes of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for the Correction of Low Myopia (2022)25 eyes · 2 years · filter match | not reported | 96.0%24 of 25 eyes · reported at/by 2 years | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not applicable | not applicable | not reported | not applicable |
| ICL · EVO Implantable Collamer LensFive-year outcomes of EVO implantable collamer lens implantation for the correction of high myopia and super high myopia (2021)Eyes not reported · 5 years · filter match | not reported | 60.5%Denominator not reported · reported at/by 5 years | 79.1%Denominator not reported · reported at/by 5 years | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not applicable | not applicable | not reported | not applicable |
| ICL · EVO Implantable Collamer LensFive-year outcomes of EVO implantable collamer lens implantation for the correction of high myopia and super high myopia (2021)Eyes not reported · 5 years · filter match | not reported | 22.5%Denominator not reported · reported at/by 5 years | 47.5%Denominator not reported · reported at/by 5 years | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not applicable | not applicable | not reported | not applicable |
Scroll sideways inside the table to see every outcome. “Not applicable” reflects the procedure type. Italic “not reported” means the publication did not provide that result; it does not mean zero events.