Ocular Evidence
Community experiences

What people report after refractive surgery

Search structured details from individual public forum accounts. These are anecdotes, not clinical evidence or estimates of how often an outcome occurs.

Read this layer differently from study results. Posts are self-reported, selectively shared and may be incomplete or inaccurate. We never combine them into complication, satisfaction or success rates.
Reset

1122 reviewed experiences

Only curator-approved records with a currently verified source appear here. No usernames or copied post bodies are published.

Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account at 2 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 6/4, 20/20. Topics included light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values+6.5 D, +5 D, -1.75 D, -2.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 weeks · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values6/4, 20/20
2 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedlight sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 2 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2024

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Device
SMILE Pro

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4.75 D, -2.75 D, +0.25 D, -0.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort, regression
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 6 weeks described the result. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 6 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 6 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account at 1.5 months described the result. Topics included halos. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1.5 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos
Both eyes · 1.5 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 2 months described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
2 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedghosting, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 3 days described the result. Topics included dry eye, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
40

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 11 days described the result. Reported acuity included 6/6. Topics included starbursts, glare, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Device
Contoura

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 11 days · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values6/6
11 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedstarbursts, glare, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 11 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

Five days after LASIK, a 28-year-old described clear vision and strong satisfaction. One eye recovered more slowly because of a pre-existing corneal scar, while screen-related dryness was mild and night driving was not problematic.

Age
28

Reported starting point

Pre-existing corneal scarScar from prior ulcer
Left eye · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Eye-specific recoveryImproving but slightly less clear than right eye
Left eye · Day 5 · stated by poster
Dry eyeMild, mainly after prolonged screen use
Both eyes · Day 5 · stated by poster
Night drivingNo issue reported
Both eyes · Day 5 · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

ICL experience · 2023

A first-person ICL account at 1 year described the result. Topics included dry eye, halos, double vision, regression. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 year · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, double vision, regression
Both eyes · 1 year · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 12/10. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values12/10
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2024

A 19-year-old treated with SMILE for about -7 D in both eyes reported steadily improving vision during the first month and later described vision as effectively normal for school and sports. Mild itching or burning sometimes occurred with long screen sessions or wind.

Age
19

Reported starting point

Approximate sphere-7 D
Both eyes · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Visual recoveryStill improving day by day
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Later symptomsMild sensitivity, itching or burning with prolonged screens or wind
Both eyes · Later update · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included halos, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account at 1 week described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/30, 20/15. Topics included halos, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
46

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-7.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/30, 20/15
1 week · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2024

After SMILE Pro with adjunctive cross-linking, the poster reported early blur and dryness plus a foreign body that required incision re-washing. The slower eye caught up after about 2.5 weeks, and a one-year update described excellent vision.

Location
South Korea
Clinic
BGN
Device
VisuMax 800

Reported starting point

Sphere-4.75 D
Both eyes · stated by poster
Cylinder-1 D
Both eyes · stated by poster

Procedure details

Procedure variantSMILE Pro with corneal cross-linking
Both eyes · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Early complicationForeign body near incision; surgical re-wash and temporary contact lens
Left eye · Day 4 · stated by poster
Eye-to-eye recoverySlower eye caught up
Both eyes · About 2.5 weeks · stated by poster
Longer-term resultVision remained excellent
Both eyes · 1 year · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account at 6 years described the result. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 6 years · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty
Both eyes · 6 years · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account at 1 month described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included halos, glare, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
29
Clinic
Eagle Eye Centre

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4.75 D, -1.75 D, -5.5 D, -0.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, glare, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2024

Two months after SMILE, the poster reported 20/15 vision and no ongoing side effects. Lubricating drops were used for roughly four to six weeks, and return to screen-based work would have been possible within days.

Age
25
Location
United States

Reported starting point

Uncorrected visual acuityApproximately 20/40
Right eye · stated by poster
Uncorrected visual acuityApproximately 20/80
Left eye · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Visual acuity20/15
Both eyes · Follow-up · stated by poster
Lubricating-drop periodUsed drops; no ongoing dry-eye complaint at 2 months
Both eyes · First 4–6 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included floaters. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-5 D, -4.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedfloaters
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/50. Topics included haze, light sensitivity, night-vision difficulty. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/50
1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhaze, light sensitivity, night-vision difficulty
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

Three months after LASIK, the poster reported better than 20/15 binocular vision and full return to normal activities. Early marked light sensitivity and dryness improved, although occasional dry-eye days continued.

Age
25
Location
Canada
Clinic
Bochner Eye Institute

Reported starting point

Approximate sphere-4 D
Both eyes · stated by poster
Approximate corneal thickness515 µm
Both eyes · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Visual acuity20/20
Right eye · 24 hours · stated by poster
Visual acuity20/15
Left eye · 24 hours · stated by poster
Binocular visual acuityBetter than 20/15
Both eyes · 6 weeks · stated by poster
Dry eyeOccasional and managed with drops
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 1 week described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Age
27

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
1 week · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort, regression
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 3 days described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
28
Clinic
American Eye Center

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
3 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedpain or discomfort
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
32

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster