Read this layer differently from study results. Posts are self-reported, selectively shared and may be incomplete or inaccurate. We never combine them into complication, satisfaction or success rates.
Reset

1160 reviewed experiences

Only curator-approved records with a currently verified source appear here. No usernames or copied post bodies are published.

Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included dry eye, glare, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
29

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, glare, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account at 5 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/10. Topics included halos, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Clinic
Eye Clinic Tokyo

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-5.25 D, -1 D, -2.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 5 months · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/10
5 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 5 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2022

About 2.5 years after LASIK for a -6 D prescription, the poster remained satisfied. Acuity shifted from 20/15 immediately after surgery to a stable 20/25, with occasional dryness and mild night starbursts that did not prevent driving.

Reported starting point

Approximate sphere-6 D
Both eyes · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Initial visual acuity20/15
Both eyes · Immediately after surgery · stated by poster
Later visual acuityApproximately 20/25
Both eyes · 2.5 years · stated by poster
Residual symptomsOccasional dryness and mild night starbursts
Both eyes · 2.5 years · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account at 1 year described the result. Topics included dry eye. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 year · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye
Both eyes · 1 year · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account at 2 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Age
23

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4.75 D, -4 D, -3.75 D, -2.75 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15, 20/20
2 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2024

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/16, 20/20. Topics included dry eye, double vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
39
Clinic
Samsung Miracle Eye Clinic
Device
SMILE Pro

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values+0.25 D, -1.5 D, +0.5 D, -2 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/16, 20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, double vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

SMILE experience · 2024

A first-person SMILE account at 1 month described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included double vision, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-0.5 D, -0.25 D, -3 D, +3 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddouble vision, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/30, 20/20, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, haze, night-vision difficulty. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-7 D, -30 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/30, 20/20, 20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, haze, night-vision difficulty, floaters
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

TRANSPRK experience

A 32-year-old described satisfaction about three weeks after TransPRK. Early pain and tearing improved, and chart acuity reportedly reached decimal 1.0 right and 1.25 left at day fifteen. By day twenty-two light sensitivity had largely resolved, although intermittent ghosting remained.

Age
32

Reported starting point

Preoperative sphere-2.75 D
Right eye · stated by poster
Preoperative sphere-3 D
Left eye · stated by poster
Reported corneal thickness650 µm
stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Reviewed follow-upDay 22
Day 22 · stated by poster
Reported decimal acuityRight 1.0; left 1.25
Day 15 · stated by poster
Residual ghostingIntermittent ghosting remained
Day 22 · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. Reported acuity included 10/10. Topics included dry eye, starbursts, glare, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Device
Femtosecond LASIK

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values10/10
1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, starbursts, glare, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 3 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values+2.5 D, +3 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 weeks · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
3 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 3 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2024

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Clinic
Icone De Vasio
Device
SMILE Pro

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-7.5 D, -1.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

SMILE experience · 2024

A first-person SMILE account at 11 months described the result. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 11 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 11 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values+4.5 D, +2.5 D, +4 D, +1 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, glare, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-1.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, glare, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2019

Five years after LASIK, the poster reported mild refractive regression, persistent ghosting and poor night vision, and years of severe dry eye that later improved somewhat. Despite these tradeoffs, they said they would still choose surgery again.

Reported results and symptoms

Later sphere-0.5 D
Both eyes · 5 years · stated by poster
Night-vision symptomsPersistent ghosting and poor night vision; nighttime driving glasses used
Both eyes · 5 years · stated by poster
Dry-eye courseSevere, including nighttime symptoms
Both eyes · First 3–4 years · stated by poster
Dry-eye courseImproved but morning drops still needed
Both eyes · 5 years · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 1 day described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Age
34

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4.75 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 day · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
1 day · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-1.25 D, -3 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedpain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2010

A first-person SMILE account at 14 years described the result. Topics included halos, glare, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
36

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 14 years · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, glare, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 14 years · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 8 months described the result. Topics included double vision, regression. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 8 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddouble vision, regression
Both eyes · 8 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account at 6 months described the result. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, glare. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 6 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, glare, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 6 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 1 day described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/12. Topics included dry eye, halos, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Age
21
Clinic
Focus Clinic

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-1.15 D, -2.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 day · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/12
1 day · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 day · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2024

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, double vision, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, double vision, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2024

A first-person SMILE account at 3 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
29
Device
SMILE Pro

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-6 D, -1 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

ICL experience · 2024

Two weeks after ICL for high myopia and astigmatism, the poster described exceptionally clear daytime vision but substantial halos and ghosting in dim light. The mixed result made nighttime vision the principal concern.

Age
33
Location
Italy

Reported starting point

Approximate sphere-7 D
Left eye · stated by poster
Approximate cylinder-3.75 D
Left eye · stated by poster
Approximate sphere-6 D
Right eye · stated by poster
Approximate cylinder-4.75 D
Right eye · stated by poster
Approximate corneal thickness600 µm
Both eyes · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Daytime visionVery clear and better than glasses
Both eyes · About 2 weeks · stated by poster
Nighttime symptomsLarge halos and ghosting in dim light
Both eyes · About 2 weeks · stated by poster