Ocular Evidence
Community experiences

What people report after refractive surgery

Search structured details from individual public forum accounts. These are anecdotes, not clinical evidence or estimates of how often an outcome occurs.

Read this layer differently from study results. Posts are self-reported, selectively shared and may be incomplete or inaccurate. We never combine them into complication, satisfaction or success rates.
Reset

1122 reviewed experiences

Only curator-approved records with a currently verified source appear here. No usernames or copied post bodies are published.

Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-1.25 D, -3 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedpain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2010

A first-person SMILE account at 14 years described the result. Topics included halos, glare, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
36

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 14 years · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, glare, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 14 years · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 8 months described the result. Topics included double vision, regression. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 8 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddouble vision, regression
Both eyes · 8 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account at 6 months described the result. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, glare. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 6 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, glare, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 6 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 1 day described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/12. Topics included dry eye, halos, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Age
21
Clinic
Focus Clinic

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-1.15 D, -2.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 day · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/12
1 day · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 day · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2024

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, double vision, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, double vision, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2024

A first-person SMILE account at 3 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
29
Device
SMILE Pro

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-6 D, -1 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

ICL experience · 2024

Two weeks after ICL for high myopia and astigmatism, the poster described exceptionally clear daytime vision but substantial halos and ghosting in dim light. The mixed result made nighttime vision the principal concern.

Age
33
Location
Italy

Reported starting point

Approximate sphere-7 D
Left eye · stated by poster
Approximate cylinder-3.75 D
Left eye · stated by poster
Approximate sphere-6 D
Right eye · stated by poster
Approximate cylinder-4.75 D
Right eye · stated by poster
Approximate corneal thickness600 µm
Both eyes · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Daytime visionVery clear and better than glasses
Both eyes · About 2 weeks · stated by poster
Nighttime symptomsLarge halos and ghosting in dim light
Both eyes · About 2 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

RLE experience · 2024

Three months after RLE, the poster described an excellent left-eye result without glasses but persistent blur in the toric right eye after an initially good first week; the surgeon proposed a secondary polishing procedure.

Device
PanOptix multifocal and PanOptix Toric

Procedure details

LensPanOptix multifocal
Left eye · stated by poster
LensPanOptix Toric
Right eye · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Visual acuity20/20
Left eye · 3 months · stated by poster
Glasses useNo glasses needed
Left eye · 3 months · stated by poster
BlurLetters and road signs remained blurry
Right eye · 3 months · stated by poster
Proposed secondary procedureSurgeon proposed polishing or brushing
Right eye · 3 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedpain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 6 months described the result. Topics included ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 6 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedghosting, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 6 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2024

A first-person SMILE account at 4 days described the result. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 4 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 4 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account at 3 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included halos, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-6.75 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
3 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account at 9 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, glare, night-vision difficulty. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-8 D, -6 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 9 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, glare, night-vision difficulty
Both eyes · 9 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account at 10 days described the result. Topics included halos, double vision, blur or fluctuating vision, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 10 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, double vision, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 10 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2024

Three days after ICL for very high myopia and astigmatism, the poster reported rapid functional recovery. Day-one acuity was recorded as 20/25, while glare and light sensitivity largely cleared by day two with only slight sunlight-related halos.

Age
30
Location
United States

Reported starting point

Sphere-9.5 D
Right eye · stated by poster
Cylinder-3.75 D
Right eye · stated by poster
Sphere-10.5 D
Left eye · stated by poster
Cylinder-3.5 D
Left eye · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Visual acuity20/25 as reported
Both eyes · Day 1 · stated by poster
Early symptomsSlight sunlight-related halos; no major glare or light sensitivity
Both eyes · Day 3 · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values+6 D, +5.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/40. Topics included dry eye, ghosting, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/40
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, ghosting, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2024

Eleven days after toric ICL for extreme myopia, a 30-year-old reported 20/15 and 20/20 eye-specific acuity and called the result life-changing. Small halos, faint device-related ghosting and occasional lens-edge reflections remained without dry-eye symptoms.

Age
30

Reported starting point

Sphere-13 D
Right eye · stated by poster
Sphere-14 D
Left eye · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Visual acuity20/15
Right eye · 1 week · stated by poster
Visual acuity20/20
Left eye · 1 week · stated by poster
Residual visual effectsSmall halos, faint ghosting and rare lens reflections
Both eyes · Day 11 · stated by poster
Dry eyeNone noticed
Both eyes · Day 11 · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included halos, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
30
Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-6 D, -4.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

SMILE experience · 2024

A first-person SMILE account at 5 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-6 D, -5.75 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 5 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 5 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-19.25 D, -18.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2024

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-6.75 D, -1 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster