Search structured details from individual public forum accounts. These are anecdotes, not clinical evidence or estimates of how often an outcome occurs.
Only curator-approved records with a currently verified source appear here. No usernames or copied post bodies are published.
A first-person SMILE account at 2 weeks described the result. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account at 6 months described the result. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/20. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account at 7 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 10/10. Topics included dry eye, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account at 2 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included halos, starbursts, haze, light sensitivity. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account at 6 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/30, 20/25, 20/20. Topics included dry eye, glare, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15. Topics included halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included starbursts, light sensitivity, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, pain or discomfort, floaters. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account at 4.5 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person SMILE account at 4 months described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/18. Topics included pain or discomfort. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person SMILE account at 3 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included halos, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account at 3 weeks described the result. Topics included dry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account at 2 years described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 10/10, 20/20, 20/50. Topics included dry eye, ghosting, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/30. Topics included dry eye, glare. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person SMILE account at 2 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included halos, starbursts, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/30, 20/40, 20/25. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/30, 20/40. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person SMILE account at 4 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/25. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.