LASIK experience · 2024
A first-person LASIK account at 1 week described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, double vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
Search structured details from individual public forum accounts. These are anecdotes, not clinical evidence or estimates of how often an outcome occurs.
Only curator-approved records with a currently verified source appear here. No usernames or copied post bodies are published.
A first-person LASIK account at 1 week described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, double vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A 20-year-old with mild-to-moderate myopia reported 20/15 vision after LASIK. First-day pain and light sensitivity gave way to brief haze and mild dryness, and the overall assessment was strongly positive.
A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/13, 20/17. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included dry eye, glare, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account at 1 year described the result. Topics included dry eye. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person ICL account at 2 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/16, 20/20. Topics included dry eye, double vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/30, 20/20, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, haze, night-vision difficulty. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. Reported acuity included 10/10. Topics included dry eye, starbursts, glare, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account at 11 months described the result. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, glare, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
Five years after LASIK, the poster reported mild refractive regression, persistent ghosting and poor night vision, and years of severe dry eye that later improved somewhat. Despite these tradeoffs, they said they would still choose surgery again.
A first-person ICL account at 6 months described the result. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, glare. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account at 1 day described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/12. Topics included dry eye, halos, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, double vision, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person SMILE account at 4 days described the result. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person ICL account at 9 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, glare, night-vision difficulty. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/40. Topics included dry eye, ghosting, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.
Eleven days after toric ICL for extreme myopia, a 30-year-old reported 20/15 and 20/20 eye-specific acuity and called the result life-changing. Small halos, faint device-related ghosting and occasional lens-edge reflections remained without dry-eye symptoms.
A first-person SMILE account at 5 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.