LASIK experience · 2016
A first-person LASIK account at 12 days described the result. Reported acuity included 20/100, 20/40. Topics included pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
Search structured details from individual public forum accounts. These are anecdotes, not clinical evidence or estimates of how often an outcome occurs.
Only curator-approved records with a currently verified source appear here. No usernames or copied post bodies are published.
A first-person LASIK account at 12 days described the result. Reported acuity included 20/100, 20/40. Topics included pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/25, 20/20, 20/15. Topics included double vision, blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account at 3 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/25. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account at 3.5 months described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/400. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account at 6 months described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included regression. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included pain or discomfort. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account at 3 weeks described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included glare, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort, regression. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/30, 20/40. Topics included dry eye. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/40, 20/15. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account at 3.5 weeks described the result. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included halos. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15, 20/40, 20/30. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, night-vision difficulty. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account at 2 years described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, glare. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included halos. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account at 6 weeks described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/25. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.