Ocular Evidence
Community experiences

What people report after refractive surgery

Search structured details from individual public forum accounts. These are anecdotes, not clinical evidence or estimates of how often an outcome occurs.

Read this layer differently from study results. Posts are self-reported, selectively shared and may be incomplete or inaccurate. We never combine them into complication, satisfaction or success rates.
Reset

1122 reviewed experiences

Only curator-approved records with a currently verified source appear here. No usernames or copied post bodies are published.

Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2019

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-9 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

ICL experience · 2019

A first-person ICL account at 4 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, ghosting. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Age
21
Device
Visian ICL

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-9.5 D, -1 D, -0.75 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 4 months · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15, 20/20
4 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, ghosting, double vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 4 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 3 days described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included halos, glare, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
3 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, glare, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

SMILE experience · 2019

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/30. Topics included dry eye, glare. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/30
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, glare
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 4 weeks described the result. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 4 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 4 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15. Topics included halos, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 1 week described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/25, 20/20. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-7.5 D, -6.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/25, 20/20
1 week · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 5 days described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15. Topics included starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
35
Device
Contoura

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 5 days · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/15
5 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedstarbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 5 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 2 weeks described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/20. Topics included halos, glare, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Age
25

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 weeks · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15, 20/20
2 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, glare, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 2 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2019

A first-person SMILE account at 2 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included halos, starbursts, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
30

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-2.5 D, -2.75 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, starbursts, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 2 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 6 months described the result. Topics included dry eye, starbursts, ghosting, night-vision difficulty. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 6 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, starbursts, ghosting, night-vision difficulty
Both eyes · 6 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 2 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Age
26

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4 D, -4.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 2 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

ICL experience · 2019

A first-person ICL account at 2 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included halos, glare, blur or fluctuating vision, floaters. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Age
28

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-12 D, -10.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 weeks · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
2 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, glare, blur or fluctuating vision, floaters
Both eyes · 2 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 2 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/30, 20/40. Topics included light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
26

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-7.5 D, -7.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 weeks · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/30, 20/40
2 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedlight sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 2 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 2.5 months described the result. Topics included dry eye, halos, ghosting, double vision. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2.5 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, ghosting, double vision
Both eyes · 2.5 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/25. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-2.5 D, -0.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/25
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 2 days described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/20. Topics included regression. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 days · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15, 20/20
2 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedregression
Both eyes · 2 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

SMILE experience · 2019

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/30, 20/40, 20/25. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-2.25 D, -0.5 D, -0.25 D, +0.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/30, 20/40, 20/25
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 1 week described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included starbursts. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Age
27

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
1 week · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedstarbursts
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 7 days described the result. Reported acuity included 6/19. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, double vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
29

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 7 days · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values6/19
7 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, double vision, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 7 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

SMILE experience · 2019

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/30, 20/40. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/30, 20/40
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/25. Topics included halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Age
31

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/25
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2019

A first-person LASIK account at 12 months described the result. Topics included glare. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 12 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedglare
Both eyes · 12 months · stated by poster