LASIK experience · 2018
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/10. Topics included dry eye, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
- Age
- 36
Search structured details from individual public forum accounts. These are anecdotes, not clinical evidence or estimates of how often an outcome occurs.
Only curator-approved records with a currently verified source appear here. No usernames or copied post bodies are published.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/10. Topics included dry eye, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account at 3 months described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, starbursts, ghosting, double vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/30, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account at 1 week described the result. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account at 1 week described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included glare, blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, glare, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 6/21, 6/29, 6/30, 20/15. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included pain or discomfort. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account at 2 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 6/15, 20/400, 6/1, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account at 1 week described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account at 5 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account at 3 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account at 2 weeks described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/10. Topics included halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account at 10 days described the result. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account at 1.5 weeks described the result. The source explicitly reported pre-existing dry eye. Topics included dry eye. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account at 4 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included pain or discomfort. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.
A first-person LASIK account at 3 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.
A first-person LASIK account at 3 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, glare. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.
A first-person LASIK account at 2 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/25, 20/10. Topics included night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.