Read this layer differently from study results. Posts are self-reported, selectively shared and may be incomplete or inaccurate. We never combine them into complication, satisfaction or success rates.
Reset

1122 reviewed experiences

Only curator-approved records with a currently verified source appear here. No usernames or copied post bodies are published.

Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account at 3 months described the result. Reported acuity included 20/12. Topics included halos, starbursts, night-vision difficulty. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Device
Contoura

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/12
3 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, starbursts, night-vision difficulty
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/20, 20/12, 20/10. Topics included dry eye, halos, glare, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
29
Device
Contoura

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-6.5 D, -6.3 D, -6.22 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15, 20/20, 20/12, 20/10
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, glare, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account at 3 months described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
3 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account at 3 days described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, night-vision difficulty. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
36

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
3 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 3 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

ICL experience · 2023

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/30, 20/40, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, double vision, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Age
28

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-5 D, -3 D, -8.5 D, -10 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/30, 20/40, 20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, double vision, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort, floaters
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, light sensitivity. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
30

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, light sensitivity, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account at 3 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
31

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-5.5 D, -5.75 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 weeks · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/15
3 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 3 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account at 4 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included double vision, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Age
42

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values+5 D, +5.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 4 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddouble vision, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 4 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account at 1 week described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
37

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-5.5 D, -6 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
1 week · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Device
Contoura

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/15
1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account at 2 months described the result. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
40

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

SMILE experience · 2023

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/25. Topics included pain or discomfort. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/25
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedpain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2023

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
27

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4 D, -6 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, light sensitivity
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

ICL experience · 2023

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/40. Topics included glare, blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-14 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/40
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedglare, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2023

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included halos, glare, ghosting, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
30

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-11 D, -11.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, glare, ghosting, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

The poster documented eye-specific acuity from minutes after LASIK through one month. Vision improved to roughly 20/12–20/10, while early starbursts, glow and daily fluctuations became slight.

Reported starting point

Sphere-2.25 D
Left eye · stated by poster
Sphere-2 D
Right eye · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Visual acuity20/50
Left eye · 15 minutes · stated by poster
Visual acuity20/20
Right eye · 15 minutes · stated by poster
Visual acuityApproximately 20/12 to 20/10
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Residual symptomsSlight glow and fluctuating sharpness
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

ICL experience · 2023

A first-person ICL account at 1 month described the result. Topics included halos. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Device
Visian ICL

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Device
Contoura

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4.25 D, -3.75 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15, 20/20
1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2023

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, starbursts, glare, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-1.5 D, -1.37 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, starbursts, glare, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2021

A first-person LASIK account at 2 years described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4 D, -4.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 years · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts
Both eyes · 2 years · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account at 7 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, light sensitivity, night-vision difficulty. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Age
25
Device
Contoura

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-5 D, -3.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 7 months · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
7 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, light sensitivity, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort, floaters
Both eyes · 7 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source explicitly reported pre-existing dry eye. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Pre-existing dry eyeExplicitly reported before the procedure
Both eyes · stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2021

A first-person LASIK account at 2 years described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included double vision, blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Age
29

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4.25 D, +1.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 years · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddouble vision, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 2 years · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, ghosting. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Age
19

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-7.5 D, -5.25 D, -0.5 D, -0.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort, regression
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2023

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included ghosting, pain or discomfort. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedghosting, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster