Ocular Evidence
Community experiences

What people report after refractive surgery

Search structured details from individual public forum accounts. These are anecdotes, not clinical evidence or estimates of how often an outcome occurs.

Read this layer differently from study results. Posts are self-reported, selectively shared and may be incomplete or inaccurate. We never combine them into complication, satisfaction or success rates.
Reset

435 reviewed experiences

Only curator-approved records with a currently verified source appear here. No usernames or copied post bodies are published.

Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

SMILE experience · 2019

A first-person SMILE account at 4 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/25. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Age
23

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-3.5 D, -1.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 4 days · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/25
4 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 4 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2018

A first-person ICL account at 4.5 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-16 D, -17.5 D, -0.5 D, -1.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 4.5 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos
Both eyes · 4.5 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included dry eye, starbursts. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, starbursts
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account at 5 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-6.75 D, -6.5 D, -7 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 5 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty
Both eyes · 5 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2017

A first-person LASIK account at 1.5 years described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1.5 years · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
1.5 years · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts
Both eyes · 1.5 years · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-2.5 D, -3.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/10. Topics included dry eye, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
36

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15, 20/10
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, haze
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account at 3 months described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, starbursts, ghosting, double vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
31

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
3 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, starbursts, ghosting, double vision
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20, 20/30, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
33

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-9.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20, 20/30, 20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account at 1 week described the result. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 week · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

SMILE experience · 2018

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included dry eye, starbursts, glare, ghosting. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, starbursts, glare, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, glare, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-7.5 D, -5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, glare, haze, light sensitivity, night-vision difficulty, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

SMILE experience · 2018

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, starbursts, double vision. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Age
27

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-8 D, -8.5 D, -2 D, -2.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, starbursts, double vision
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account at 2 days described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 6/15, 20/400, 6/1, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Age
30

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4.75 D, -0.75 D, -4.5 D, -0.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 days · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values6/15, 20/400, 6/1, 20/15
2 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 2 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account at 3 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Age
25

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-1.75 D, -2 D, -10 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account at 1.5 weeks described the result. The source explicitly reported pre-existing dry eye. Topics included dry eye. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
29

Reported starting point

Pre-existing dry eyeExplicitly reported before the procedure
Both eyes · stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1.5 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye
Both eyes · 1.5 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account at 3 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-6.5 D, -7.5 D, -7 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account at 3 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, glare. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-8 D, -0.5 D, -1 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, glare, haze, night-vision difficulty
Both eyes · 3 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-20 D, -2 D, -3 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2018

A first-person LASIK account at 7 months described the result. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 7 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 7 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2017

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15, 20/20. Topics included dry eye, glare, double vision, haze. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-1.5 D, -0.5 D, -2.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15, 20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, glare, double vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2017

A first-person LASIK account at 2 months described the result. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
2 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2017

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster