Ocular Evidence
Community experiences

What people report after refractive surgery

Search structured details from individual public forum accounts. These are anecdotes, not clinical evidence or estimates of how often an outcome occurs.

Read this layer differently from study results. Posts are self-reported, selectively shared and may be incomplete or inaccurate. We never combine them into complication, satisfaction or success rates.
Reset

1122 reviewed experiences

Only curator-approved records with a currently verified source appear here. No usernames or copied post bodies are published.

Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2026

A first-person EVO ICL account described the first 24 hours after surgery. The source reported a baseline prescription of -8.5 D in each eye, pressure returning from 28 to 15 after treatment, and next-day acuity of 20/15 right and 20/20 left. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-8.5 D in each eye
Both eyes · stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 24 hours · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15 right, 20/20 left
24 hours · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedMinimal dry eye and temporary light sensitivity
Both eyes · 24 hours · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2026

A first-person LASIK account at two months described severe postoperative dry eye under specialist care. The source reported reduced corneal sensitivity, reduced tear break-up time, and discussion of Prokera after several attempted treatments. The source did not give an overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedSevere dry eye and reduced corneal sensitivity
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2026

A first-person SMILE account at one month described a favorable recovery. The source reported a baseline prescription of -4.75 and -5.00 D, 20/15 acuity at the five-day check, and early halos and light sensitivity that had resolved by one month.

Location
United States
Device
ZEISS SMILE

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4.75 D and -5.00 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
Both eyes · 5 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedEarly halos and light sensitivity reported resolved
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

LASIK experience · 2025

A first-person LASIK account at ten months described an unfavorable result after treatment for hyperopia and astigmatism. The source reported a preoperative prescription around +3.00 to +3.25 D, a current -0.75 D myopic correction, blurred distance vision, and difficult night vision.

Location
Italy

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values+3.00 to +3.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 10 months · stated by poster
Reported postoperative refraction-0.75 D correction worn
10 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedBlurred distance vision and night-vision difficulty
Both eyes · 10 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2026

A first-person LASIK account at six weeks described an initially sharp result followed by early regression and fluctuating blur. The poster reported roughly -8.75 to -9.00 D before surgery, 20/20 vision during the first week, and a later manifest refraction of -1.25 and -1.75 D. The overall result was mixed.

Age
31

Reported starting point

Reported prescription valuesApproximately -8.75 to -9.00 D
Both eyes · stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 6 weeks · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Both eyes · First week · stated by poster
Reported postoperative refraction-1.25 D and -1.75 D
6 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedDry eye, halos, starbursts, fluctuating blur, and regression
Both eyes · 6 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

ICL experience · 2026

A first-person ICL account at 1 month described the result. Topics included halos. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Age
23

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

LASIK experience · 2026

A first-person LASIK account at 1 month described the result. Topics included starbursts. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Device
WaveLight Plus

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedstarbursts
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2026

A first-person LASIK account at 2 months described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Device
Femtosecond LASIK

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-0.5 D, -0.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedghosting, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 2 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

ICL experience · 2024

A first-person ICL account at 2 years described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included glare. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Age
25

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-11 D, -13.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 years · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedglare
Both eyes · 2 years · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2026

After approximately 18 years in glasses, the poster underwent LASIK with adjunctive cross-linking because the measured corneal thickness made standard LASIK less suitable. They described marked discomfort immediately after surgery.

Age
25

Reported starting point

Sphere-6.25 D
Left eye · stated by poster
Sphere-5.25 D
Right eye · stated by poster
Corneal thickness472 µm
stated by poster

Procedure details

Procedure variantLASIK Xtra with corneal cross-linking
Both eyes · stated by poster

Reported results and symptoms

Immediate recoveryMarked discomfort and difficulty opening the eyes
Both eyes · Surgery day · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2023

A first-person SMILE account at 3 years described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/10, 20/20, 20/15. Topics included dry eye, halos, starbursts, glare. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
28

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-1.25 D, -1.75 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 3 years · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/10, 20/20, 20/15
3 years · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, halos, starbursts, glare, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 3 years · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2026

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included dry eye, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

SMILE experience · 2026

A first-person SMILE account at 1 day described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-4.75 D, -5 D, -2.5 D, -1.75 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 day · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision, haze, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 day · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

SMILE experience · 2026

A first-person SMILE account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Device
SMILE Pro

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-2.25 D, -1.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

LASIK experience · 2026

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 10/10, 20/20, 20/16. Topics included halos, glare, haze, light sensitivity. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Device
Contoura

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-5.25 D, -4.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values10/10, 20/20, 20/16
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, glare, haze, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2026

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-17 D, -11 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedblur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2026

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included halos. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-13 D, -3 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteSentiment unclear

ICL experience · 2026

A first-person ICL account at 4 months described the result. Topics included dry eye, haze. The source did not state a clear overall satisfaction judgment.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentunclear
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 4 months · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, haze
Both eyes · 4 months · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2026

A first-person ICL account at 2 weeks described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 6/9, 6/6. Topics included halos, pain or discomfort, floaters. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
24

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-11.5 D, -1.5 D, -12 D, -1.25 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 2 weeks · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values6/9, 6/6
2 weeks · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, pain or discomfort, floaters
Both eyes · 2 weeks · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

SMILE experience · 2026

A first-person SMILE account at 1 month described the result. Reported acuity included 6/6. Topics included starbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, light sensitivity. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values6/6
1 month · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedstarbursts, blur or fluctuating vision, haze, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · 1 month · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported satisfied

ICL experience · 2026

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Reported acuity included 20/15. Topics included halos, glare, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was favorable.

Age
19
Device
EVO ICL

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-8.5 D, -7.75 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/15
Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, glare, blur or fluctuating vision, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

ICL experience · 2026

A first-person ICL account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included halos, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, night-vision difficulty. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-13 D, -14 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhalos, blur or fluctuating vision, light sensitivity, night-vision difficulty
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

LASIK experience · 2026

A first-person LASIK account at 20 days described the result. Topics included dry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, haze. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 20 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discusseddry eye, blur or fluctuating vision, haze
Both eyes · 20 days · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteReported dissatisfied

LASIK experience · 2026

A first-person LASIK account with a postoperative follow-up described the result. The source included baseline prescription values. Topics included haze, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort. The poster's overall assessment was unfavorable.

Reported starting point

Reported prescription values-3.5 D
stated by poster
Overall self-assessmentunsatisfied
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedhaze, light sensitivity, pain or discomfort
Both eyes · Follow-up reported · stated by poster
Self-reported anecdoteMixed report

ICL experience · 2026

A first-person ICL account at 5 days described the result. Reported acuity included 20/20. Topics included glare, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision. The poster described a mixed result or a recovery with meaningful tradeoffs.

Reported starting point

Overall self-assessmentmixed
Both eyes · curator inference

Reported results and symptoms

Follow-up pointPostoperative experience reported
Both eyes · 5 days · stated by poster
Reported visual-acuity values20/20
5 days · stated by poster
Symptoms discussedglare, ghosting, blur or fluctuating vision
Both eyes · 5 days · stated by poster